November 01, 2025

Get In Touch

Use Of Titanium Brushes Promising For Implant Surface Decontamination During Surgical Treatment Of Peri-Implantitis

The use of titanium brushes promising for Implant Surface Decontamination During Surgical Treatment Of Peri-Implantitis suggests a new study published in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Study was done to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive/alternative photo-/mechanical and physical implant-surface decontamination approaches compared to a standard instrumentation in conjunction with surgical peri-implantitis treatment.

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) investigating the efficacy of adjunctive or alternative photo-/mechanical/physical measures for implant surface decontamination in conjunction with surgical peri-implantitis treatment without (PICOS 1) or with (PICOS 2) additional decontamination methods performed in test and control groups with changing inflammation parameters. Changes in bleeding scores (i.e., bleeding index (BI), or bleeding on probing (BOP)), suppuration (SUP) and PD values were considered as primary outcomes.
Results
Six articles describing five original RCTs were eligible for analysis.
Based on two RCTs, the adjunctive/alternative use of an air polishing with glycine or erythritol powders did not improve BOP reduction compared to a standard instrumentation (PICOS 1).
Based on one RCT, alternative use of titanium brushes resulted in significantly higher BOP reduction compared to either air polishing or a standard instrumentation (PICOS 1).
During reconstructive therapy and as an adjunct to implantoplasty, use of a titanium brush did not have a benefit on the BOP and mean PD reductions compared to the control group (i.e., implantoplasty + mechanical and chemical implant surface decontamination; 1 RCT; PICOS 2).
An Er:YAG laser resulted in significantly higher PD reduction after 6 months (1 RCT), whereas no difference between the test and respective controls could be detected after 1 and 2 years (1 RCT).
Additionally, the use of the Er:YAG laser was not associated with improved BOP reductions over respective controls (2 RCTs; PICOS 2).
Due to the limited available data, clinical efficacy of photo-/mechanical and physical implant surface decontamination in conjunction with surgical peri-implantitis therapy is inconclusive. However, titanium brushes may be beneficial in reducing signs of inflammation.
Reference:
Ramanauskaite, A., Schwarz, F., Chea, E.A.C. and Sahrmann, P. (2023), Photo-/ mechanical and physical implant surface decontamination approaches in conjunction with surgical peri-implantitis treatment: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. Accepted Author Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13783

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!