August 19, 2025

Get In Touch

Trueness Of Shade Matching With Intraoral Scanners Low Compared To Spectrophotometers, Finds Study

Study on Shade Matching Accuracy

Study on Shade Matching Accuracy

Researchers have found in a new study that the trueness of shade matching with intraoral scanners was low compared to spectrophotometers. Therefore, shade determination with intraoral scanners is not recommended. The study has been published in the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the accuracy of intraoral scanners and spectrophotometers in determining tooth shade. An electronic search of five databases was conducted on October 19, 2023:

  • PubMed
  • Scopus
  • Embase
  • Web of Science
  • CENTRAL

A total of 163 studies were identified from the databases, of which 23 articles were eligible for inclusion.

Study Inclusion and Analysis

In vivo and in vitro quasi-experimental studies were included. After data extraction, a quantitative analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the intraoral scanner in subgroups using four outcomes: trueness and precision with different measurement locations. A random-effects model was used to pool effect sizes. The pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for the effect size measure.

Results

Eleven articles were included in the meta-analysis. Trueness with the intraoral scanner was between 0.28 (CI: 0.09–0.60) and 0.38 (CI: 0.24–0.53). Repeatability was between 0.81 (CI: 0.64–0.91) and 0.85 (CI: 0.74–0.92). Trueness showed low, and precision had moderate certainty of evidence. The trueness of shade matching with intraoral scanners is low compared to spectrophotometers, although the precision is considered high and is similar to spectrophotometers.

Reference

Vitai, V., Németh, A., Teutsch, B., Kelemen, K., Fazekas, A., Hegyi, P., Németh, O., Kerémi, B. and Borbély, J. (2024), Color Comparison Between Intraoral Scanner and Spectrophotometer Shade Matching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13309

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!