
TMT Has Limited Sensitivity To Detect Coronary Microvascular Disease, Finds Study
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 18 February, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality even in the absence of flow-limiting epicardial disease. Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is assessed by direct interrogation (invasive or noninvasive) of coronary microvascular function. Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is the non invasive approach for the evaluation of CMD. However, role of TMT in CMD is less studied.
Diana M. Lopez et.al, conducted this study to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of TMT in the diagnosis of CMD. This is a retrospective study done in patients who underwent TMT and PET at Boston, USA. A total of 249 patients were included. Among these 35% tested positive for TMT, 42% were negative and 23% were inconclusive. CFR was reduced (<2) in 98 (39.4%) patients and preserved in 151 (60.6%) patients.
Patients were followed for the occurrence of a first major adverse event, defined as a composite of death or hospitalization for nonfatal MI or heart failure.
Key findings of the study are
1) The sensitivity and specificity of a positive TMT to detect CMD were 34.7% and 64.9% respectively.
2) The specificity of a positive TMT to detect CMD increased to 86.8% when only classifying studies with ischemic electrocardiogram changes that lasted at least 1 minute into recovery as positive, although at a cost of lower sensitivity
3) Over a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 30patients met the composite endpoint, including 13 with CMD. In patients with CMD, TMT result was not associated with the composite endpoint.
Authors concluded that TMT has limited sensitivity to detect CMD. However, a positive TMT with ischemic changes that persist at least 1 minute into recovery in the absence of obstructive CAD should raise suspicion for the presence of CMD given a high specificity.
Source: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.

Recent News
Normal-Tension Glaucoma Closely Associated With Co...
- 10 October, 2022
Air Pollution Tied To Increased Risk Of Premature...
- 24 May, 2023
NEET PG 2024: NBE Opens Pre-Final Edit Window
- 30 May, 2024
NMC Mulls Over Removal Of Upper Age Cap In MBBS En...
- 30 November, 2021

Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!