Titanium Plasma Sprayed (TPS) vs. HA-coated Implants in Dentistry

Titanium plasma sprayed (TPS) is as good as HA-coated implants in dentistry, according to a recent study published in the Journal of Periodontology.

This study evaluated bone regeneration and osseointegration of hydroxyapatite (HA) coated and titanium plasma sprayed (TPS) implants placed in sockets immediately after extraction in 36 adults, mean age 55.2 years (range 26 to 81 years). Twelve TPS and 10 HA-coated implants in 20 patients were grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA), covered with a barrier material, and the facial flap coronally positioned to attain primary closure (experimental). The remaining 11 TPS and 10 HA-coated implants were placed similarly, except that no DFDBA was used (control). Osseous structures were measured at the initial placement and 6-month re-entry surgeries.

Results

At the 6-month re-entry, all implants placed were clinically osseointegrated. Bone resorption at the most coronal socket crest was −1.53 mm for the grafted group and −1.59 mm for the control group. Crestal bone apposition of 1.39 mm was noted at the most apical socket crest (ASC) for the grafted group, whereas crestal resorption of −0.11 mm was noted in the ungrafted control group (P < 0.02). Bone fill from the base of the deepest osseous defect was 5.68 mm for the grafted group and 3.18 mm for the control group (P < 0.04). Complete resolution of osseous defects occurred at 15 of 22 sites in the grafted group and at 9 of 21 sites in the control group. Clinical exposure of the barrier material and a subsequent inflammatory response at 27 of 43 sites required removal of the material prior to the 6-month re-entry and was associated with significantly more bone loss at the ASC sites (P < 0.01).

Thus, the study concluded that there was no significant difference for any of the parameters when comparing the TPS with the HA-coated implants.

Reference

Bone Grafting and Guided Bone Regeneration for Immediate Dental Implants in Humans by Marlin E. Gher, et al. published in the Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.9.881