
Tirzepatide Bests Insulin Degludec For Achieving Blood Sugar Targets In Type 2 Diabetes: Lancet
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 18 February, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

USA: Once-weekly treatment with tirzepatide compared to insulin degludec led to superior glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin, with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor, says a recent study published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.
The findings provide additional evidence to the effect and potential of tirzepatide for achieving glycemic targets without increasing hypoglycemia risk versus basal insulin.
Tirzepatide, a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 receptor agonist, is under development for type 2 diabetes treatment. In the study, Katelyn Brown, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, and colleagues aimed to compare the 24 h glucose profile of participants given tirzepatide compared with those who were given insulin degludec using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
For this purpose, the researchers performed a substudy of the open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 SURPASS-3 trial at 45 sites across six countries. Eligible participants in the main study were adults with type 2 diabetes, a baseline HbA1c of 7·0–10·5% (53–91 mmol/mol), and a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or more, who were insulin-naive, and treated with metformin alone or in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor for at least 3 months before screening.
People in the main study were randomly assigned in the ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive a once-weekly subcutaneous injection of tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg, or a once-daily subcutaneous injection of titrated insulin degludec (100 U/mL).
The substudy enrolled a subset of these patients with a normal wake-sleep cycle, and interstitial glucose values were collected by CGM for approximately 7 days at baseline, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks.
The primary outcome compared pooled participants assigned to 10 mg and 15 mg tirzepatide versus insulin degludec for the proportion of time that CGM values were in the tight target range (71 - 140 mg/dL) at 52 weeks. The secondary outcome compared tirzepatide (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg) versus insulin degludec for the proportion and duration of time in the tight target range at 24 and 52 weeks.
313 participants were screened for eligibility from April 1 to Nov 27, 2019, 243 of whom were enrolled in CGM substudy (tirzepatide 5 mg, n=64; tirzepatide 10 mg, n=51; tirzepatide 15 mg, n=73; and insulin degludec, n=55).
Based on the study, the researchers reported the following findings:
Patients given once-weekly tirzepatide (pooled 10 mg and 15 mg groups) had a greater proportion of time in a tight target range compared with patients given insulin degludec.
Participants assigned to tirzepatide spent significantly more time in the tight target range at 52 weeks compared with those assigned to insulin degludec (5 mg 12%; 10 mg 24%; and 15 mg 25%).
Participants assigned to tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg, but not to tirzepatide 5 mg, spent significantly more time in a tight target range at 24 weeks compared with insulin degludec (10 mg 19%; 15 mg 21%).
"Once-weekly treatment with tirzepatide showed superior glycaemic control measured using CGM versus insulin degludec in people with type 2 diabetes on metformin, with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor," wrote the authors.
"Findings provide additional evidence of the effect of tirzepatide and the potential for achieving blood sugar targets without an increase of hypoglycaemic risk compared with basal insulin," they concluded.
Reference:
The study titled, "Efficacy of once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec on glycaemic control measured by continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3 CGM): a substudy of the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 SURPASS-3 trial," was published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00077-8
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:

Recent News
Normal-Tension Glaucoma Closely Associated With Co...
- 10 October, 2022
Air Pollution Tied To Increased Risk Of Premature...
- 24 May, 2023
NEET PG 2024: NBE Opens Pre-Final Edit Window
- 30 May, 2024
NMC Mulls Over Removal Of Upper Age Cap In MBBS En...
- 30 November, 2021

Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!