Tight Blood Sugar Control Fails To Impact Outcomes In Patients Not Receiving Early Parenteral Nutrition: NEJM
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 06 August, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

In critically sick patients who did not receive early parenteral nutrition, tight glucose control had no impact on the duration of required ICU care or mortality rates, says an article published in New England Journal of Medicine. The study involved over 9,000 patients, aimed to address the ongoing debate about the benefits and risks of tight blood-glucose control in the ICU.
The study assigned patients upon ICU admission to one of two groups: liberal glucose control or tight glucose control. The liberal group only initiated insulin treatment when blood glucose levels exceeded 215 mg per deciliter, while the tight control group used the LOGIC-Insulin algorithm to maintain blood glucose levels between 80 to 110 mg per deciliter. Additionally, both groups refrained from using parenteral nutrition for one week.
The results of the trial are eye-opening. Among the 9,230 patients enrolled, there was no significant difference in the length of ICU stay between the two groups. This finding suggests that tight glucose control did not result in shorter ICU stays. Furthermore, the 90-day mortality rate was almost identical in both groups, with 10.1% for liberal glucose control and 10.5% for tight glucose control. This indicates that tight glucose control did not have a significant impact on patient survival.
The study also found that the incidence of new infections, the duration of respiratory and hemodynamic support, the time to discharge alive from the hospital, and ICU and hospital mortality rates were similar between the two groups. However, tight glucose control seemed to have a positive effect in reducing the prevalence of severe acute kidney injury and cholestatic liver dysfunction.
One of the remarkable aspects of this research is that it sheds light on the importance of context in medical treatments. The absence of early parenteral nutrition might explain why these findings differ from some previous studies that suggested potential benefits of tight glucose control.
Reference:
Gunst, J., Debaveye, Y., Güiza, F., Dubois, J., De Bruyn, A., Dauwe, D., De Troy, E., Casaer, M. P., Haghedooren, R., Jacobs, B., Meyfroidt, G., Wouters, P. J., Stessel, B., … Van den Berghe, G. (2023). Tight Blood-Glucose Control without Early Parenteral Nutrition in the ICU. In New England Journal of Medicine (Vol. 389, Issue 13, pp. 1180–1190). Massachusetts Medical Society. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2304855
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:
Recent News
Chennai: Fortis Healthcare Opens 250-Bedded 2nd Mu...
- 06 July, 2025
New Lab-On-A-Chip, Cheaper, Faster, On The Spot Di...
- 06 July, 2025
Steroids And Plasma Exchange Do Not Alter Prognosi...
- 14 February, 2020
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!