September 18, 2025

Get In Touch

Tailored Electronic Health Record Improves Optimal Care For HF Patients: PROMPT-HF Trial

Heart Failure Study

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is one of the most common chronic illnesses in the United States and carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. The use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with HFrEF has been shown to dramatically improve outcomes, but adoption of these treatments remains generally low.

Study Overview

A recent study suggests that the targeted and tailored electronic health record (EHR) alert system for HFEF outpatients improves guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) at 30 days. The study findings were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology on April 03, 2022.

Challenges in GDMT Uptake

Possible explanations for poor GDMT uptake include lack of knowledge about recommended management strategies and provider reluctance due to uncertainties regarding the application of said guidelines to real-world practice. One way to overcome these barriers is by harnessing the electronic health record to create patient-centred "best practice alerts" (BPAs) that can guide clinicians to prescribe appropriate medical therapies. Therefore, Dr. Lama Ghazi and her team conducted a study to examine whether targeted and tailored EHR alerts recommending GDMT in eligible patients with HFrEF improve utilization.

The PROMPT-HF Trial

The PRagmatic Trial Of Messaging to Providers about Treatment of Heart Failure (PROMPT-HF) trial is a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial in which the researchers included 100 providers caring for 1,310 patients with HFrEF and further randomized the patients to either an alert or usual care. The alert notified providers of individualized GDMT recommendations along with patient characteristics. The primary outcome assessed was an increase in the number of GDMT classes prescribed 30 days post-randomization. They further surveyed the providers on knowledge of guidelines and user experience.

Key Findings of the Study

  • At baseline, the researchers noted that 84% were receiving β-blockers, 71% RAASi, 29% MRA, and 11% SGLTi.
  • The primary outcome occurred in 176/685 (26%) participants in the alert arm versus 117/625 (19%) in the usual care arm with an increasing GDMT class prescription by >40% after alert exposure [adjusted RR: 1.41].
  • No differences in 30-day rates of emergency department visits or hospitalization between the two groups and no differences in safety outcomes were observed.
  • For providers receiving alerts, 79% of providers agreed or strongly agreed that the BPA helped improve GDMT regimens.

Conclusion

The authors concluded, "A real-time, targeted and tailored EHR-based alerting system for outpatients with HFrEF led to significantly higher rates of GDMT at 30 days when compared with usual care. This low-cost intervention can be rapidly integrated into clinical care and accelerate adoption of high-value therapies in heart failure."

In a summary report, Dr. Yamamoto L. Ghazi and his team wrote, "An intervention of this type utilizes the immense power of EHR data and mechanics to have a broad reach across the health care system for little cost. As demonstrated in this study, these BPAs have a significant impact on provider practices and patient care. These are very promising results and help providers overcome clinical inertia."

Further Information

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.338

Keywords

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Emergency Service
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • Health Care Costs
  • Heart Failure
  • Quality Improvement
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Guideline-directed medical therapy
  • Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
  • Best practice alerts
  • HFrEF
  • PROMPT-HF trial

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!