October 31, 2025

Get In Touch

Standardized Management Protocols Improve Outcomes After Emergency Laparotomy

Standardized Treatment Methods in Emergency Laparotomy

Standardized Treatment Methods in Emergency Laparotomy

Following an emergency laparotomy, standardized treatment methods enhanced results, says an article published in the British Journal of Surgery. Acute high-risk abdominal surgery is prevalent, as are the risks of organ failure, the requirement for intensive care, death, and a lengthy hospital stay. Terje Timan and colleagues conducted this study to evaluate the application of standardized management.

A prospective analysis of all persons undergoing emergency laparotomy was conducted over a 42-month period (2018-2021), and the results were compared to those of a retrospective control group. For all patients, a new standardized clinical protocol was implemented, which included:

  • Prompt bedside physical evaluation by the surgeon and anesthetist
  • Interprofessional communication regarding resuscitation location
  • Elimination of unnecessary factors that could delay surgery
  • Enhanced operating theater competence
  • Enhanced recovery care
  • Regular epidural
  • Regular early warning scores

The 30-day mortality rate was the main outcome. The duration of hospital stay, the requirement for critical care, and surgical complications were secondary objectives.

Key Findings

  • There were 1344 patients in all, including 663 in the control group and 681 in the intervention group.
  • The revised strategy shortened the time between the decision to operate and the commencement of surgery (3.80 against 3.22 h) and increased the usage of antibiotics (81.4 versus 94.7 percent).
  • There were fewer anastomoses (22.5 versus 16.8 percent).
  • The 30-day mortality rate in the historical control group was 14.5%, while it was 10.7% in the intervention group (P = 0.045).
  • The average length of stay in the hospital (11.9 vs 10.2 days; P = 0.007) and ICU (5.40 versus 3.12 days; P = 0.007) was similarly reduced. Serious surgical complications (grade IIIb-V) were less common (37.6 versus 27.3%; P = 0.001).

Reference

Timan, T. J., Karlsson, O., Sernert, N., & Prytz, M. (2023). Standardized perioperative management in acute abdominal surgery: Swedish SMASH controlled study. In British Journal of Surgery. Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad081

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!