
Single-Use Bronchoscopes Associated With Lower Costs, Fewer Readmissions During Bronchoscopy: Study
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 18 February, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

USA: A recent study has revealed that adopting a single-use flexible bronchoscope (SFB) can reduce readmission rates by over half, and potentially lower costs during bronchoscopies, a common endoscopy procedure. The results add to the growing body of evidence of the benefits of SFB over reusable flexible bronchoscopes (RFB) suggesting that all hospitals should use single-use bronchoscopy as the standard of care, given the financial, clinical, and operational benefits.
The study results were presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians, which took place virtually from October 17 to 20 and was subsequently published in the CHEST journal.
Improper reprocessing of bronchoscopes is known to pose a serious patient safety and infection risk. Previous studies have reported the risk of patient infection resulting from the use of contaminated bronchoscopes to be 2.8%. SFB has been introduced recently as an alternative to RFB. By virtue of being sterile, SFB may reduce the infection risk, subsequent readmission rates, and associated costs while enhancing operational efficiency.
"We know when patients go in for bronchoscopy that there is always that potential risk of an infection," said study author John Hudson Garrett Jr., PhD, of the University of Louisville School of Medicine in Kentucky, during his presentation of the data. "The infection can be related either to the healthcare environment itself or to the device, in this case, the bronchoscope. … The literature as well as [Manufacturer and User Facility Device] MAUDE reports from the FDA and the most recent FDA safety alert have documented that reprocessing of reusable devices continues to play a risk … of reprocessing failure that subsequently increases mortality and morbidity. There have been over 500 reports of adverse events associated with reprocessing failures with bronchoscopy alone."
"To reduce these risks, the use of a sterile SFB should be considered to eliminate reprocessing failures, improve overall operational efficiency, and reduce potential acquisition of healthcare-associated infections," the authors wrote. "Recent data from FDA 522 studies in the gastrointestinal clinical setting has demonstrated the widespread risks associated with reusable flexible endoscopes. These lessons learned must be adapted to the clinical procedure of bronchoscopy, especially in an era of an ongoing global pandemic."
For the study, the researchers identified bronchoscopies with SFB and RFB along with their corresponding readmission information in the Premier Healthcare Database (PHD) from 2016-2019. Summary statistics were calculated on readmissions segmented by scope type and clinical setting.
A total of 14,228 procedures identified, of which 1,795 used SFB and 12,433 used a RFB (9,401 outpatient and 4,827 inpatient).
The study revealed the following findings:
In the inpatient setting, the RFB group was ~2.5 times more likely to be readmitted within 30 days compared to the SFB group (OR=2.5), controlling for patient demographics and risk.
In the outpatient setting, the RFB group was ~1.5 times more likely to be readmitted than the SFB group (OR=1.5).
Across all settings, the RFB group was ~2.3 times more likely to be readmitted than the SFB group (OR=2.3).
The inability to fully risk-adjust in the outpatient setting may have been a factor in the smaller OR and lack of statistical significance; this limitation will be addressed with further analysis that includes an outpatient severity of illness classification variable.
"The data analysis demonstrates significant clinical benefits of SFB in reducing readmissions and risks," the authors concluded.
Reference:
The study titled, "STERILE, SINGLE-USE BRONCHOSCOPE REDUCES ASSOCIATED READMISSION RATES AND INFECTION RISK: A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL ANALYSIS," is published in the CHEST journal.
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:

Recent News
Normal-Tension Glaucoma Closely Associated With Co...
- 10 October, 2022
Air Pollution Tied To Increased Risk Of Premature...
- 24 May, 2023
NEET PG 2024: NBE Opens Pre-Final Edit Window
- 30 May, 2024
NMC Mulls Over Removal Of Upper Age Cap In MBBS En...
- 30 November, 2021

Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!