
Refusal Of High-Risk Patients To Take Statin Common And Tied To Higher LDL Cholesterol Levels: JAMA
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 18 February, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

USA: Over 20 percent of patients at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease refused to take statin medications; this trend was particularly common among women, a recent study published in JAMA Network Open has shown.
The study further showed that patients who do not accept statin therapy have significantly higher LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels.
According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, killing someone in the United States every 34 seconds. A new study by investigators from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system, conducted the first population-based study on patients’ nonacceptance of statin therapy recommendations.
The researchers were particularly surprised that women were about 20 percent more likely than men to refuse statin therapy when their physician first suggested it and 50 percent more likely than men never to accept the recommendation. The study also showed that all patients who refused statin therapy developed higher LDL (“bad”) cholesterol levels, likely increasing their risk even further.
“Our study highlights the alarming number of patients who refuse statins and signals that physicians must have discussions with patients about why,” says Alex Turchin, MD, MS, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School and director of quality in the Brigham’s Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension. “We need to better understand our patients’ preferences and be able to provide more patient-centered care.”
After Turchin began noticing that many of his patients with high cholesterol, including those with diabetes, were opting not to take safe and beneficial medications like statins that can lower cholesterol and bring down the risk of heart attack and stroke, he developed a system to more closely study the phenomenon by analyzing the text of provider notes.
The study focused on high-risk patients who either had coronary artery or vascular disease, diabetes, very high cholesterol, or had suffered a stroke. All were recommended statin medications by their physicians to reduce their risk of heart attack and stroke and reduce cholesterol levels. The retrospective study included more than 24,000 patients who were seen at Mass General Brigham between Jan. 1, 2000, and Dec. 31, 2018.
“Even in this higher-risk patient population, so many people did not accept statin therapy,” Turchin said. The study found that while about two-thirds of the patients who were being recommended statin therapy eventually tried it, about one-third never did. And it took three times as long for people in the study who initially said no to taking statin medications to reduce their LDL cholesterol levels to less than 100, compared to people who initially said yes.
The study’s biggest surprise, however, was the much higher rate of refusal by women than men. Turchin and his colleagues wonder if this might be partly due to a false misconception that heart disease impacts men more than women, and plan to further research the reasons underlying these results.
“Ultimately, we need to talk to our patients and find out in more detail why they would prefer not to take statins,” Turchin says. He is currently looking at the impacts of nonacceptance of statin therapy on outcomes that matter to most to patients, including heart attacks, strokes, and death. “I think people underestimate how much of a difference modern medicine has made in extending people’s lives and their quality of life, and medications can play a big role in that.”
Reference:
Brown CJ, Chang L, Hosomura N, et al. Assessment of Sex Disparities in Nonacceptance of Statin Therapy and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Among Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(2):e231047. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1047
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:

Recent News
Normal-Tension Glaucoma Closely Associated With Co...
- 10 October, 2022
Air Pollution Tied To Increased Risk Of Premature...
- 24 May, 2023
NEET PG 2024: NBE Opens Pre-Final Edit Window
- 30 May, 2024
NMC Mulls Over Removal Of Upper Age Cap In MBBS En...
- 30 November, 2021

Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!