June 22, 2025

Get In Touch



Recurrence Of Gram-Negative Bacterial Blood Stream Infections Due To Relapse Not Reinfection

A recent investigation has revealed that relapse was the most common cause of recurrent Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI). The study was published in the journal, "Clinical Infectious Diseases."
As there is not much understanding of the causes and clinical characteristics of recurrent gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI), researchers from the U.S.A. conducted a study to understand the recurrence pattern of the GNB-BSI. A prospective study was conducted on patients with GNB-BSI to identify clinical characteristics, microbiology, and risk factors associated with these recurrent infections. Bacterial genotyping which included both pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE] and whole genome sequencing [WGS] was used to define whether these episodes were due to relapse or reinfection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with recurrence.

Also Read: Weekly insulin-icodec exhibits Superior reduction of HbA1c compared to insulin degludec in two trials
Results:
1423 patients with GNB-BSI met the criteria for inclusion in this study.
Of these 60 (4%) had recurrent GNB-BSI.
Non-white race, admission to a surgical service, and presence of an indwelling cardiac device were associated with increased risk for recurrent GNB-BSI.
63% were due to relapse (30/48) and 38% were due to reinfection (18/48) based on WGS, among the 48 patients with recurrent GNB-BSI whose paired bloodstream isolates underwent genotyping,
PFGE correctly differentiated relapse and reinfection in 98% (47/48) of cases compared with WGS.
The median time to relapse and reinfection was similar (113 days vs. 174 days).
The presence of a cardiac device was associated with relapse.
Also Read: Calorie labeling doesn't deter shoppers from purchasing high-calorie foods: JAMA
Thus, the researchers concluded that relapse was the most common cause of recurrent GNB-BSI, and the presence of a cardiac device was a risk factor for relapse. They also found that PFGE was more accurate in differentiating relapse from reinfection when compared with WGS.
To read the full article, click here: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac638
Bock A, Hanson BM, Ruffin F, et al. Clinical and Molecular Analysis of Recurrent Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 5]. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;ciac638.

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!