Prednisolone Use In URTI Fails To Prevent Relapse Of Steroid-Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: JAMA
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 29 July, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

Low-dose prednisolone during upper respiratory tract infection does not prevent relapse in children with relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, according to a recent study published in the JAMA Pediatrics.
In children with corticosteroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, many relapses are triggered by upper respiratory tract infections. Four small studies found that administration of daily low-dose prednisolone for 5 to 7 days at the time of an upper respiratory tract infection reduced the risk of relapse, but the generalizability of their findings is limited by the location of the studies and selection of the study population.
A group of researchers conducted a study to investigate the use of daily low-dose prednisolone for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection-related relapses.
This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Prednisolone in Nephrotic Syndrome [PREDNOS] 2) evaluated 365 children with relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome with and without background immunosuppressive treatment at 122 pediatric departments in the UK from February 1, 2013, to January 31, 2020. Data from the modified intention-to-treat population were analyzed from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. At the start of an upper respiratory tract infection, children received 6 days of prednisolone, 15 mg/m2 daily, or matching placebo preparation. Those already taking alternate-day prednisolone rounded their daily dose using trial medication to the equivalent of 15 mg/m2 daily or their alternate-day dose, whichever was greater.
The primary outcome was the incidence of first upper respiratory tract infection-related relapse. Secondary outcomes included the overall rate of relapse, changes in background immunosuppressive treatment, cumulative dose of prednisolone, rates of serious adverse events, the incidence of corticosteroid adverse effects, and quality of life.
The results of the study are as follows:
The modified intention-to-treat analysis population comprised 271 children (mean [SD] age, 7.6 [3.5] years; 174 [64.2%] male), with 134 in the prednisolone arm and 137 in the placebo arm. The number of patients experiencing an upper respiratory tract infection-related relapse was 56 of 131 (42.7%) in the prednisolone arm and 58 of 131 (44.3%) in the placebo arm. No evidence was found that the treatment effect differed according to background immunosuppressive treatment. No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes between the treatment arms. A post hoc subgroup analysis assessing the primary outcome in 54 children of South Asian ethnicity (risk ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40-1.10) vs 208 children of other ethnicity found no difference in efficacy of the intervention in those of South Asian ethnicity.
Thus, the researchers concluded that the results of PREDNOS 2 suggest that administering 6 days of daily low-dose prednisolone at the time of an upper respiratory tract infection does not reduce the risk of relapse of nephrotic syndrome in children in the UK. Further work is needed to investigate interethnic differences in treatment response.
Reference:
Evaluation of Daily Low-Dose Prednisolone During Upper Respiratory Tract Infection to Prevent Relapse in Children With Relapsing Steroid-Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: The PREDNOS 2 Randomized Clinical Trial by Martin T. Christian, et al. published in the JAMA Pediatrics.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2787006?guestAccessKey=6d5f67a6-7778-4234-90ac-e20ba9ea08d0&utm_source=silverchair&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=article_alert-jamapediatrics&utm_content=olf&utm_term=122021
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Recent News
Air Pollution May Slow Infant Brain Development: S...
- 23 October, 2025
AI Outperforms Traditional Tools in Predicting Hea...
- 23 October, 2025
Nearly Half of Acute Pancreatitis Patients Develop...
- 23 October, 2025
Can Fat You Can’t See Put You at Risk for Stroke a...
- 23 October, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!