June 23, 2025

Get In Touch



Novel Endovascular Technique May Prevent Amputation In "No-Option" Limb Ischemia Patients: NEJM Study

Approximately 20% of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia have no revascularization options- surgical or percutaneous, due to poor distal targets, leading to above-ankle amputation. Providing a new hope for these patients, authors Shishehbor et al have shown the utility of transcatheter arterialization of the deep veins as a means to restore circulation and prevent the previously inevitable foot amputation .

Key treatments for chronic limb-threatening ischemia include guideline-directed medical therapy to address risk factors for systemic cardiovascular disease and revascularization of the affected leg to restore straight-line arterial flow to the foot and facilitate wound healing.
Two major revascularization – surgical bypass and minimally invasive endovascular techniques approaches can be pursued in patients with limb ischemia. Both these techniques connect artery to artery and require a downstream target of an unobstructed vessel in the lower leg or foot on which to “land” the treatment. However, in as many as 15 to 20% of persons with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, there is no landing point, owing to diffuse distal arterial disease, which precludes conventional revascularization.
It is for these specific no-option patients that Shishehbor and colleagues present their findings from the PROMISE II study in the latest issue of NEJM.
The novel concept:
In this technique, arterial flow in the leg is connected to the downstream deep-venous segments instead of to an arterial target, thereby reversing flow in the veins and perfusing the distal limb through the venous rather than the arterial system.
One catheter is advanced in the artery from the groin to the knee; another catheter is advanced in the vein from the foot to the knee. At this rendezvous point behind the knee, the artery and vein are mechanically connected with the use of a needle, a guide wire, and covered stents. This creates a straight pathway from the upper-leg arterial system to the venous circulation of the foot, effectively “arterializing” the venous flow and providing oxygenated blood to the ischemic tissues.
The salient features of study were:
In the PROMISE II study, the investigators prospectively enrolled 105 patients with advanced chronic limb-threatening ischemia who were deemed to have no revascularization options and to face a likely prospect of major amputation.
The primary end point of this nonrandomized, single-group study was 6-month amputation-free survival, defined as freedom from above-ankle amputation or death from any cause.
The investigators reported procedural success in 99% of the patients and 6-month amputation-free survival in 66.1%, which exceeded the prespecified performance goal of 54.0%.
Complete wound healing was noted in 25% of the patients and partial healing in half.
Outcomes were worse for patients who were receiving dialysis than for those without renal failure.
“Bringing arterial blood into venous vessels may be considered a unique version of gerrymandering by means of reclassifying the composition of circulation to the foot”, notes Douglas E. Drachman, M.D. in an accompanying editorial.
Source: NEJM
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2216380
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212754

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!