Intensive BP Control Tied To Increase In Whole-Brain Cerebral Blood Flow
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 03 July, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins
 
                            
                                    USA: Intensive antihypertensive treatment compared to the standard one is associated with increased, rather than decreased, cerebral perfusion, especially in patientss with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This is the main finding of secondary analysis of the SPRINT MIND randomized clinical trial that was published in the journal JAMA Neurology online on March 7, 2022.
Antihypertensive treatments in hypertension patients benefits cerebrovascular health and cognitive function. However, there is no clarity on whether a intensive blood pressure (BP) targeted leads to cerebrovascular health and cognitive function. Considering this, Sudipto Dolui, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues aimed to investigate the association of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control vs standard control with whole-brain cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the substudy of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) randomized clinical trial.
The study compared the efficacy of 2 different blood pressure–lowering strategies with longitudinal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including arterial spin labeled perfusion imaging for quantifying CBF. The study included 1267 adults 50 years or older with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk but free of diabetes or dementia. They were screened for the SPRINT substudy from 6 sites in the US. Randomization began in November 2010 with final follow-up MRI in July 2016.
Subjects with baseline CBF measures were randomized to receive an intensive SBP target less than 120 mm Hg or standard SBP target less than 140 mm Hg. Change in whole-brain CBF from baseline was the primary outcome.
The mean (SD) age of 547 participants with CBF measured at baseline was 67.5 years and 219 (40.0%) were women; 315 completed follow-up MRI at a median of 4.0 years after randomization.
Salient findings of the study were as follows:
Mean whole-brain CBF increased from 38.90 to 40.36 (difference, 1.46) mL/100 g/min in the intensive treatment group, with no mean increase in the standard treatment group (37.96 to 37.12; difference, –0.84 mL/100 g/min; between-group difference, 2.30).
Gray, white, and periventricular white matter CBF showed similar changes.
The association of intensive vs standard treatment with CBF was generally similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, chronic kidney disease, SBP, orthostatic hypotension, and frailty, with the exception of an indication of larger mean increases in CBF associated with intensive treatment among participants with a history of cardiovascular disease.
To conclude, intensive compared to standard antihypertensive treatment was associated with increased, rather than decreased, cerebral perfusion, most notably in participants with a history of cardiovascular disease.
Reference:
Dolui S, Detre JA, Gaussoin SA, et al. Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral Blood Flow: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. Published online March 07, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0074
KEYWORDS: JAMA, intensive antihypertensive treatment, cerebral blood flow, hypertension, cognitive function, cerebral perfusion, BP lowering, blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, BP, BP control
                                
    Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
    The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
    Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
    If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at 
    admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
    We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
    By using this website, you agree to our 
    Terms of Use, 
    Privacy Policy, and 
    Advertisement Policy.
    For further details, please review our 
    Full Disclaimer.
Recent News
Merck Keytruda wins European Commission nod for lo...
- 30 October, 2025
UP NEET 2025 round 3 allotment results postponed
- 30 October, 2025
Achin Gupta to succeed Umang Vohra as Cipla MD, GC...
- 30 October, 2025
Mumbai shocker: KEM Hospital doctor stabbed by col...
- 30 October, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
 
                     
                    
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!