
High-Dose Recombinant Vaccine May Enhance Protection Against Influenza Among Adults Aged 50-64
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 18 February, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

In a groundbreaking cluster-randomized observational study, Kaiser Permanente Northern California has unveiled compelling evidence supporting the superiority of a high-dose recombinant influenza vaccine over standard-dose egg-based vaccines. The study concluded that the high-dose recombinant vaccine was more protective than the standard egg-based vaccine.
The study was conducted during the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 influenza seasons and involved a staggering 1,630,328 vaccinees aged 18 to 64 years.
The study results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Also Read: Gender-neutral HPV vaccination best at preventing cervical cancer
This cutting-edge research, driven by the imperative to evaluate the relative effectiveness of vaccine formulations, focused on adults aged 50 to 64 years—the primary target age group. The high-dose recombinant vaccine, known as Flublok Quadrivalent, contained an impressive three times the amount of hemagglutinin protein, a critical component for immune response, compared to conventional egg-based vaccines. Furthermore, the recombinant formulation demonstrated resilience against antigenic drift during manufacturing, a notable advantage in vaccine development. As there is uncertainty on the relative effectiveness of various vaccines, Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities conducted a cluster-randomized observational study to evaluate the relative effectiveness of recombinant vaccines.
The study, employing a cluster-randomized design, saw Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities alternate weekly between the high-dose recombinant vaccine and two standard-dose influenza vaccines. The primary outcome of interest was laboratory-confirmed influenza (A or B) identified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Secondary outcomes encompassed influenza A and B subtypes, as well as influenza-related hospitalization rates. The results, unveiled after a meticulous analysis employing Cox regression, revealed a striking disparity in vaccine effectiveness between the two formulations.
Results:
Among participants aged 50 to 64 years, the recombinant vaccine demonstrated a 15.3% higher relative effectiveness against PCR-confirmed influenza compared to standard-dose vaccines.
This translates to a notable reduction in influenza cases, with 559 participants per 1000 testing positive in the recombinant-vaccine group, as opposed to 925 participants per 1000 in the standard-dose group.
Notably, the heightened protection extended to specific influenza subtypes, with the recombinant vaccine exhibiting a 15.7% higher relative effectiveness against influenza A in the same age group.
This robust efficacy against influenza A, a strain known for its severity, underscores the potential public health impact of adopting advanced vaccine formulations.
However, while the high-dose recombinant vaccine emerged as a standout performer in preventing PCR-confirmed influenza, it did not demonstrate a significant advantage in protecting against influenza-related hospitalization when compared to standard-dose vaccines.
Also Read: ACOG Recommendations Highlight Importance of Influenza Vaccination for Pregnant women
In conclusion, this comprehensive study underscores the substantial benefits of the high-dose recombinant influenza vaccine for adults aged 50 to 64 years. The threefold increase in hemagglutinin protein content and resistance to antigenic drift position the recombinant formulation as a frontrunner in influenza vaccine development. As the world grapples with evolving health challenges, research of this nature paves the way for enhanced protection against seasonal influenza, offering a glimmer of hope for a healthier and more resilient future.
Further reading: Recombinant or Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Adults under 65 Years of Age. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:2245-2255. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302099
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:

Recent News
Normal-Tension Glaucoma Closely Associated With Co...
- 10 October, 2022
Air Pollution Tied To Increased Risk Of Premature...
- 24 May, 2023
NEET PG 2024: NBE Opens Pre-Final Edit Window
- 30 May, 2024
NMC Mulls Over Removal Of Upper Age Cap In MBBS En...
- 30 November, 2021

Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!