September 06, 2025

Get In Touch

Fibrin Sealant May Reduce Hospitalization And Operative Time Among Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy: Study

Fibrin Sealant in Thyroidectomy

Fibrin Sealant in Thyroidectomy

Fibrin sealant may reduce length of hospitalization and operative time among patients undergoing thyroidectomy, suggests a study published in the BMC Surgery.

Various studies have focused on the application of fibrin sealants (FS) in thyroid surgery. Utilizing a meta-analysis, this systematic review analyzed the findings of recent randomized controlled trials on the safety and efficacy of FS in patients who underwent thyroidectomy. The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Medline databases were searched for relevant studies, without any language restrictions. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the originally identified 69 studies. Overall, 652 patients received FS during thyroid surgery; their outcomes were compared with those of conventionally treated patients.

Primary Outcomes

  • Total volume of wound drainage (mean deviation (MD): -29.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): -55.39 to -4.11, P = 0.02)
  • Length of hospitalization (MD: -0.84, 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.66, P < 0.00001)
  • Operative time (MD: -7.60, 95% CI: -14.75 to -0.45, P = 0.04)

Secondary Outcomes

The risk of hypoparathyroidism did not differ between the FS and conventional groups (I = 0%, relative risk = 1.31, P = 0.38). Analysis of “seroma formation that required invasive treatment” indicated that FS showed some benefit (I2 = 8%, relative risk 0.44, P = 0.15). Heterogeneity among the different trials limited their conclusions. The meta-analysis showed that although FS use did not significantly reduce seroma or hypoparathyroidism incidence in patients after thyroidectomy, it significantly reduced the total drainage volume, length of hospitalization, and duration of surgery.

Reference

Zheng, X., Wang, F., Su, Y.C. et al. Efficacy and safety of fibrin sealant application in patients undergoing thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg 24, 122 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02414-2

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!