
Elevated Lp(A) Levels And CAC Score Together Heighten Risk Of ASCVD, Finds New Analysis Of MESA Study
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 18 February, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score are individually associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk but have not been studied in combination.
A research by preventive cardiologists at UT Southwestern Medical Center has revealed that Patients with both a high lipoprotein(a) and high coronary artery calcium score (CAC) face a more than 20% risk of heart attack or stroke over the following 10 years. Further it was found that the risk of ASCVD was seen highest among people with elevated Lp(a) and CAC ≥ 100.
The findings are online in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) and will appear in the March print edition.
"We are hopeful that by making the connection between Lp(a) and CAC as dual risk drivers, we can raise awareness in the medical community and improve earlier heart attack prevention for these patients," said cardiologist Parag Joshi, M.D., Associate Professor of Internal Medicine at UT Southwestern.
"Our data may also expedite the development of treatments designed specifically for this high-risk population," said Dr. Joshi, a member of the Clinical Heart and Vascular Center at UT Southwestern.
Approximately one in six people in the U.S. have high Lp(a), a type of bad cholesterol whose levels are driven largely by one's genes. Coronary artery calcium, known as CAC, is a marker of plaque deposits around the heart.
The team of researchers, which included researchers from Emory University, found that participants with combined high Lp(a) and high CAC had a 22% 10-year risk of heart attack or stroke, compared with a 10-15% 10-year risk in patients who had either risk factor alone.
Investigators identified three distinct risk-related trends:
High Lp(a), high CAC: These individuals face the highest 10-year risk of heart attack or stroke.
High Lp(a), zero CAC: 10-year heart attack and stroke risk is low when there is no CAC, even if Lp(a) is high.
Low Lp(a), high CAC: 10-year heart attack or stroke risk is higher than average but lower than with high LP(a) and high CAC combined.
"Establishing the connection between Lp(a) and CAC means we can move to the important next phase of research, which will be defining and personalizing early screening protocols to identify patients at high risk of heart attack," said Dr. Joshi, whose research focuses on assessing risk for heart attack and stroke, CAC, cholesterol, and coronary CT angiography. "With further research, this could mean selectively scanning patients with high Lp(a) for their CAC score, and studying therapies specifically designed to reduce Lp(a) among patients with high CAC."
Cardiology researchers confirmed the Lp(a) and CAC connection by comparing data from two landmark cardiovascular trials:
The Dallas Heart Study, an ongoing comprehensive study of 6,000 diverse and heart-healthy patients conducted by UT Southwestern from 2000 to present
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA): A 6,000-participant study investigating early-stage atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries).
The researchers concluded that Lp(a) and CAC are independently associated with ASCVD risk and may be useful concurrently for guiding primary prevention therapy decisions.
In an accompanying editorial, Dr Sotirios Tsimikas wrote that this study provides important insights into Lp(a) pathophysiology with CAC, implications for clinical care, and the ability to identify the patients most likely to benefit from Lp(a) lowering. Both Lp(a) and CAC should be more broadly applied in clinical care settings in patients without prior ASCVD to identify those that most likely will benefit from more aggressive therapy and, in the future, from Lp(a)-lowering therapies.
For further information:
Mehta A, Vasquez N, et al. Independent association of lipoprotein(a) and coronary artery calcification with atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:757-768.
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:

Recent News
Normal-Tension Glaucoma Closely Associated With Co...
- 10 October, 2022
Air Pollution Tied To Increased Risk Of Premature...
- 24 May, 2023
NEET PG 2024: NBE Opens Pre-Final Edit Window
- 30 May, 2024
NMC Mulls Over Removal Of Upper Age Cap In MBBS En...
- 30 November, 2021

Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!