September 18, 2025

Get In Touch

Child Dies After MR Vaccine Shot At Chennai Hospital: Rs 2 Lakh Compensation Ordered

Chennai: Tamil Nadu Government has been directed by the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) to pay Rs 2 lakh as compensation to the father of a pediatric patient who died soon after being administrated with the Measles and Rubella (MR) vaccine.
The case goes back to 2018, wherein, the vaccine administrated by doctors at a Chennai Hospital had allegedly caused the death of the 5-year-olf girl.
Based on a newspaper report published on May 5, 2018, D. Jayachandran, a member of SHRC took suo motu cognizance of the incident. This step by the commission was followed by the submission of a proof affidavit against the hospital before the commission by the deceased's father.
Also Read: Patient dies after flash pulmonary oedema: Private hospital, doctor directed to pay Rs 12 lakh compensation
As per the latest media report by the Times of India, the child was administrated with the vaccine around 11 am on May 2, 2018. Claiming that before taking the vaccine the girl had no health issues, the father alleged that only 15 minutes after taking the vaccine, the patient started complaining about breathlessness and severe burning in the eyes. Soon, the child fainted and was taken to the emergency ward by the hospital staff. The parents allegedly got no permission to visit their daughter and the next day the child was pronounced dead.
Following a complaint with the Flower Bazaar Police Station, the father claimed that the reason for his daughter's death was medical negligence on part of the assistant professor and other hospital staff. Along with a demand for suitable action against the hospital and the doctor, the complainant had asked for a compensation of Rs 10 lakh, adds The Hindu.
The hospital, however, denied all these allegations. TOI adds that assistant professor at the Institute of Social Paediatrics, the dean and the head of the department at the institute denied charges of medical negligence and irregularities.
Claiming that the child had developed only anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction), which had been treated immediately, the hospital and the doctor further mentioned that the MR vaccine was a multi-dose vial. They further contended that 20 other children had been administrated the vaccine from the same vial on that day and there had been no other complications, adds TOI.
The respondents denied the charges of not letting the parents see their daughter.
Also Read: Rs 1.4 crore compensation slapped on doctors for missing retinopathy of prematurity at birth
After taking note of all the arguments of both the parties and examining their documents including the report of the Director of Medical Education (DME), Chennai, the Commission observed that the materials on record clearly had shown that the child died due to an adverse event that followed the MR vaccination at the Government Hospital.
The Hindu quotes the statement of the Commission noting,
"However, it is not in dispute that the child died due to pulmonary edema with pneumonitis and acute tubular injury of the kidneys. But the respondent has not produced any document to show that the child died due to an individual immune response to the vaccine. Further, the respondent has not produced any document to show the records pertaining from January 2018 to December 2018, though they have vaccinated 428 children with the MR vaccine, except of the deceased child D.G. Thanishka."
It further pronounced,
"Therefore, the death of the deceased child D.G. Thanishka caused irreparable loss and much mental agony to the complainant on this aspect. Therefore, considering the pathetic situation and also on humanitarian grounds, on behalf of the respondents, the Government of Tamil Nadu is vicariously liable to pay compensation to the victim child's father/complainant. Therefore, this Commission is of the opinion that a sum of ₹2 lakh to the victim's father should be awarded to him."
Also Read: Vision loss post-cataract surgery: Ophthalmologist exonerated of medical negligence charges

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!