
Application Of PREVENT Risk Calculator Would Reclassify Many Patients To Lower ASCVD Risk, Shrink Statin Candidate Pool: JAMA
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 18 February, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins

USA: Research suggests that rules for starting statin and blood pressure (BP) medications may be revised with a new and enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction tool.
Employing the PREVENT equations would reclassify 53% of US adults into lower atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk categories, while only 0.41% would be moved to higher risk categories, according to the current definitions by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA).
Applying these risk estimates to current treatment criteria would reduce the number of eligible statin users from 81.8 million to 67.5 million and decrease candidates for antihypertensive therapy from 75.3 million to 72.7 million, based on nationally representative projections by Arjun Manrai, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues.
The projected outcome: an additional 107,000 cases of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke over ten years, the researchers reported in JAMA.
Since 2013, the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) have recommended the pooled cohort equations (PCEs) for estimating the 10-year risk of ASCVD.
A recent AHA scientific advisory group developed the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTS (PREVENT) equations, which now include kidney measures, exclude race as a factor, and offer improved calibration for contemporary populations. While PREVENT equations yield lower ASCVD risk predictions than the PCEs, the potential clinical implications of these differences have yet to be fully quantified.
Against the above background, James A. Diao, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues estimated the number of US adults who would experience changes in risk categorization, treatment eligibility, or clinical outcomes when applying PREVENT equations to existing ACC and AHA guidelines.
The study analyzed a nationally representative cross-sectional sample of 7,765 U.S. adults aged 30 to 79 years, who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 2011 to March 2020, with response rates ranging from 47% to 70%.
The main outcomes measured included differences in predicted 10-year ASCVD risk, risk categorization by the ACC and AHA, eligibility for statin or antihypertensive therapy, and projected occurrences of myocardial infarction or stroke.
The study led to the following findings:
In a nationally representative sample of 7765 US adults aged 30 to 79 years (median age, 53 years; 51.3% women), it was estimated that using PREVENT equations would reclassify approximately half of US adults to lower ACC and AHA risk categories (53.0%) and very few US adults to higher risk categories (0.41%).
The number of US adults receiving or recommended for preventive treatment would decrease by an estimated 14.3 million for statin therapy and 2.62 million for antihypertensive therapy.
The study estimated that over 10 years, these decreases in treatment eligibility could result in 107,000 additional occurrences of myocardial infarction or stroke.
Eligibility changes would affect twice as many men as women and a greater proportion of Black adults than White adults.
"Using the PREVENT equations to assign lower ASCVD risk predictions could lead to a reduction in eligibility for statin and antihypertensive therapy among 15.8 million U.S. adults by adjusting current treatment thresholds," the researchers concluded.
Reference:
Diao JA, Shi I, Murthy VL, et al. Projected Changes in Statin and Antihypertensive Therapy Eligibility With the AHA PREVENT Cardiovascular Risk Equations. JAMA. Published online July 29, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.12537
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.

Recent News
Normal-Tension Glaucoma Closely Associated With Co...
- 10 October, 2022
Air Pollution Tied To Increased Risk Of Premature...
- 24 May, 2023
NEET PG 2024: NBE Opens Pre-Final Edit Window
- 30 May, 2024
NMC Mulls Over Removal Of Upper Age Cap In MBBS En...
- 30 November, 2021

Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!